When the Wind Blows
The animation that I watched, “When the Wind Blows,” was very different from what I had first anticipated. The movie, made in 1986, is about a couple that builds a shelter to prepare for a nuclear attack. The director, Jimmy T Murakami, has also directed “Battle Beyond the Stars,” and “The Christmas Carol.”
From just reading the title, I thought it would be about a couple in the country living their lives, but it ended up being very different. I don’t know much about nuclear wars and the holocaust, so this movie gave me a good perspective.
Looking at the animation itself, I found it very interesting. What I think stuck out most to me was the different types of drawing and animation that was used throughout the movie. Some scenes looked real while others were very much cartoons. This is different than most typical cartoon animations that I have seen. Most Disney movies like “Aladdin” and “The Little Mermaid “ have one consistent type of animation. There is one movie, “Enchanted,” that came into my mind when watching this movie. In Enchanted, there is real life acting with actors and sets, and there was also animation with cartoons. Even though “When the Wind Blows,” was nothing like this, it was one thing that was sort of similar. In “When the Wind Blows,” I couldn’t pick one specific type of animation. There was once scene where the camera is panning through the house and it looks like everything is made out of clay. Then there is the scene where the couple is laying with blankets and the blankets look real while the couple is still cartoonish. These two scenes stuck out to me because they were so different. It was very back in and forth in terms of how I perceived the movie. One minute I thought it was a scene made of clay, and then next minute it looked completely computer drawn. At the beginning of the movie, it was real people and real cars, which compares to the movie "Enchanted." I remember thinking, "Am I on the correct YouTube video." I was confused at why there wasn't an animation until the actual story started. Of everything that I took away from this movie, that was definitely the most memorable. Being able to use different types of animation in one movie can bring a lot to a story line. If someone brought up this idea to me before watching this movie, I would have been confused and probably would have thought it was a bad idea, but after watching, I think it is a really cool effect.
I also took note of the camera angles and sounds throughout the movie. The camera angles were great and the way the movie was shot overall was great. I like how they changed the way you looked a one specific place, such as the kitchen, so that you got to see it from all angles. This gives the audience more to work with and think about. I believe that imagination is a huge part of making an animation great, and I was able to imagine a lot during this movie because it gave so much information. This goes along with sound as well. The sounds used and even the voices of the character fit the movie perfectly. During some scenes, I was able to close me eyes and imagine being there with the characters. It is hard for a lot of movies to do that, especially animations.
Overall, I though the use of camera angles, animation types, and sounds all worked very well for the movie. Jimmy did a great job of showing deeper sides of the characters, giving more meaning to the story!